System.Text.RegularExpressions Library

Search

---

Popular tags

#parsing [10], #digits [6], #web [5], #text [5], #replace [4], #simple [4], #numbers [4], #group [3], #example [3], #remove [3], #string [3], #html [2], #validate [2], #uri [2], #split [2], #datetime [2], #date [2], #non capturing [2], #sample [2], #ip address [2], #ip [2], #dns [2], #space [2], #number [2], #language [2], #file [2], #0-100 [2], #numbers between 0 to 100 [2], #0 to 100 [2], #mail [1]

---

Authors

stackoverflow [14], admin [7], mahajan344 [3], nitrogeniy [1], jnickel [0], gsanfordm [0], Jasper [0], bwilliams [0], Sree24 [0], oysteinheimstad [0], msicc [0], netregex [0], regex [0]

Regex - \d is less efficient than [0-9] - get ALL Unicode digits

\d checks all Unicode digits, while [0-9] is limited to these 10 characters. For example, Persian digits, ?????????, are an example of Unicode digits which are matched with \d, but not [0-9]. [0-9] isn't equivalent to \d. [0-9] matches only 0123456789 characters, while \d matches [0-9] and other digit characters, for example Eastern Arabic numerals ٠١٢٣٤٥٦٧٨٩

Type: match, Date: 7/12/2015 2:34:00 PMAuthor: stackoverflow

---